Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter69

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-08 | 48KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. NW, Washington, DC
20006.

   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 8, 1981,
and this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 69.

   A few days ago on the morning of November 4, the eyes of the world
were on Cape Canaveral, Florida. An American space shuttle sat poised
for launch on Pad 39-A, the home of America's moon flights a decade
ago. According to NASA, the shuttle was scheduled for launch at 7:30
that morning. What we were watching, my friends, was another NASA
publicity hoax. NASA had no intention of actually launching the
shuttle that day.

   The shuttle now at Cape Canaveral is not the "Columbia" as
claimed--it is the training shuttle "Enterprise", as I reported last
June in AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 65. It is there for only one reason: to
help NASA buy time. It was the Enterprise, not the Columbia, that we
saw making that dramatic landing in California last April. Most
Americans are unaware that the Columbia was destroyed in space after
it took off from Cape Canaveral.

   NASA is continuing to buy time while secret modifications of the
next space shuttle are underway at White Sands, New Mexico, and so
right now we're seeing hoaxes like the aborted countdown on November
4. As I mentioned a moment ago, NASA had no intention of allowing an
actual launch earlier this week. What they did want was an exciting
countdown to sustain public interest and explain away the next delay.

   The key to the NASA publicity show was the master countdown
computer called the "Automatic Sequencer." It was deliberately
programmed to delay the countdown at T minus 9 minutes and then to
stop it completely just 31 seconds before launch. With those
arrangements made, NASA forged ahead with its pretended launch
preparations. For several days ahead of time, NASA spokesmen solemnly
said that the weather would have to be almost perfect at launch time.
The reason, we were told over and over, was that the shuttle might
have to abort its take-off and glide back to land at Cape Canaveral.
That is exactly the plan which I made public last June in AUDIO LETTER
No. 65.

   The military shuttle planners are still actively considering a
deliberately aborted launch soon, and they want to prepare us in case
they carry it out. But on November 4 the launch preparations were only
make-believe, and so NASA pressed ahead with the countdown with only
lip service to the worsening weather. The countdown went without a
hitch to the "T minus 9 minutes" mark and then stopped for a final
planned "Hold." We were told that this was the decision point when
Launch Control would either go ahead or "scrub." Newsmen craned their
necks at the worsening clouds and shook their heads. It began to rain
on spectators 10 miles from the launch pad; then the rain reached the
VIP stand, twice as close to the shuttle; next, rain started pelting
TV reporters at their forward outposts, closest of all to the launch
pad. Surely, they said, NASA would have to scrub the launch; but to
NASA Launch Control, only the countdown itself mattered that day. They
knew there could be no launch because the countdown computer had been
programmed to prevent it, and so the announcement from NASA surprised
many. The decision was to go ahead for a launch. The final 9 minutes
of the countdown were used to help lay the foundation for things to
come.

   First, the countdown computer refused to resume the count at T
minus 9 minutes. Shortly NASA announced that it was merely a computer
programming problem. Moments later the count began. Everything went
smoothly until T minus 31 seconds. Then the count stopped again. Once
again, said NASA, it was a programming goof. The shuttle itself was
fine, we were told, but the computer had not been given the right
instructions.

   By that point, my friends, it was a critical point in the count, so
close to launch. The shuttle fuel tanks had been sealed up, ready to
go; the shuttle had been cut loose from its ground links and was
trembling with power, ready to go. All kinds of things had to be shut
down, cooled off, reset, and recycled for another try.

   For the next two hours or so television reports concentrated on how
crucial computers are to the shuttle. They ended up making one basic
point, and that is: even if the shuttle itself is in perfect
condition, a mistake in programming its computers can cause the
unexpected to happen. This, my friends, is NASA's way of getting us
ready to accept it if they do carry out a so-called
"Return-to-landing-site abort." They will say afterward that it was
all caused by a computer programming problem. They will emphasize that
the shuttle itself performed perfectly, and so the shuttle project
should not be interfered with. Finally when they are ready for the
third shuttle launch, they will assure us that the computer problems
have all been solved. This, my friends, was the true purpose of the
November 4 shuttle countdown hoax. They have now paved the way for an
aborted take-off soon if they choose to carry out the plan I made
public in AUDIO LETTER No. 65.

   Having accomplished that much, the NASA launch team finally
scrubbed the November 4 launch with a different excuse. We're being
told that the hydraulic power units, called APUs, need an oil and
filter change; and with that story, NASA is once again buying more
time. Using one excuse after another, NASA has succeeded so far in
slipping the next shuttle launch, time after time, without arousing
public suspicion. It's now almost seven months since the first shuttle
launch on April 12, 1981. Even so, these delays cannot continue
indefinitely. The countdown for the space shuttle program is only part
of a far greater countdown--the countdown toward NUCLEAR WAR ONE!

   Earlier this year of 1981 I revealed that the American Bolsheviks
here are trying to follow a definite timetable in their war plans.
That timetable calls for the war sequence to begin around mid-1982. A
chain of events will begin that is to culminate finally in NUCLEAR WAR
ONE.

   My friends, up to now they are still on that timetable. Mid-1982 is
less than a year away now, and so regardless of the low chances of
success, the military space shuttle team will have to try a launch
soon. Whatever they try will be a desperate gamble in light of
Russia's overwhelming military power in space. But time is slipping
away for the space shuttle. The choice is gradually becoming: either
use it or lose it.

   The State Socialists here, the American Bolsheviks who now control
America's military policies, are in a frenzy to throw America's
nuclear arsenal at Russia. During recent weeks this military frenzy
has been manifesting itself in many ways. These range from the
so-called Reagan Administration decision on the MX missile and B-1
Bomber to shocking statements about "limited nuclear war." At the same
time, America's economy is being dragged down into an inflationary
depression to set the stage for DICTATORSHIP! And most ominous of all,
my friends, a specific act has taken place since my last AUDIO LETTER
report that has lit one of the fuses for war!

   In a number of recent tapes I've discussed the similari ty between
the multiplying crises of today and those that led up to World War I.
Those crises set the stage, but a specific incident acted as the
trigger that led to war. That event, my friends, was the unexpected
assassination of a key political figure. It happened in 1914, and now
in 1981 it has happened again.

   My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:

Topic #1--THE SADAT ASSASSINATION FOR NUCLEAR WAR ONE Topic #2--THE
REAGAN ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM TO POLANDIZE AMERICA Topic #3--THE MX
DECISION AND AMERICA'S FIRST-STRIKE POSTURE.

Topic #1--Assassination politics can be counted on always to strike
without warning. One fateful day it struck in a capital city not far
from the Mediterranean Sea. The day began without a hint of what was
about to happen. The Mediterranean sun was bright and warm, the sort
of day that is perfect for picnics and parades. An unusual leader was
scheduled to be seen in public appearances on that fateful day. He was
a strong-minded man, not universally admired but certainly an
attention-getter. For his public appearances that day he was all
decked out with a full complement of medals to enhance his image.

   He was a controversial man, and his policies were stirring up
heated debate. He had staked out a course in foreign policy that set
him apart from others in his region. There were many who did not like
his ideas. Throughout the region in which this unusual man lived, deep
divisions were threatening to explode into violence. The central
problem had to do with a disenfranchised minority who were scattered
through parts of the several nations. This minority group were the
victims of great power maneuvering that had changed the map a
generation earlier. They had been left without the national identity
they craved, and scattered through parts of several nations.

   For decades the people of this disenfranchised minority had been
struggling to regain their rights, and slowly but surely they were
growing more powerful. These facts weighed heavily in the mind of the
controversial leader on that bright, sunny day. He was convinced that
the course which he was promoting was the right one. He was involved
in negotiations that could lead to a form of regional autonomy for the
disenfranchised minority. They would be given this autonomy within the
nations where they lived. His public appearances on that sunny day
were intended to underscore his determination to continue down his
chosen course. It was only a matter of time, he thought, until his own
diplomatic ideas brought lasting peace to his troubled region and
honor to himself.

   That was this man's dream, my friends, but the dream ended abruptly
as a nightmare. In the warmth of the bright Mediterranean sun, the
chilling shock of assassination politics suddenly intervened. There
was a hail of gunfire; and this man who had staked out such an
independent course lay dead.

   The assassination was followed immediately by questions piled on
more questions. "How big was the conspiracy?" The answer at first
appeared to be only a handful, perhaps four or five men. Later there
were hints that it might have been much bigger than that. "What about
the suspicious behavior of the neighboring government toward the
assassinated leader?" The evidence was conflicting about that. And,
"Why had effective protection been so completely lacking for such an
important leader?" To this day, my friends, that question remains a
mystery.

   It is often said that history repeats itself; and so it does, my
friends, if only we can learn to see it.

   I have just described not just one historical event, but two. One
of these events was the assassination of the entity known as President
Anwar Sadat of Egypt last month on October 6. The other event, which
fits exactly the same description, was an assassination which took
place 67 years ago. I am referring to the assassination of Archduke
Franz Ferdinand of Austria on June 28, 1914. The assassination last
month took place in the Egyptian capital city of Cairo, some 100 miles
south of the Mediterranean coast. The victim was the entity President
Sadat. Over the past half decade Sadat had become highly controversial
and isolated in the Arab world. The reason for this was his
involvement with Israel by way of the so-called Camp David Accords.

   The great problem in the Middle East today is, of course, that of
the Palestinians. They are the disenfranchised minority of today,
victims of the great power map-making which created Israel a
generation ago. The Palestinians, largely dispossessed from their
former homeland, are today scattered like orphans throughout several
nations; but they have never lost their determination to regain their
rights and their national identity, and slowly but surely they are
growing more powerful. Most Arab leaders today support these
Palestinian aspirations in undiluted form, but four years ago Sadat
broke ranks with his Arab brothers by his unilateral overtures toward
Israel. From that time onward Sadat became identified with a sort of
halfway solution to the Palestinian problem. That solution is called
"autonomy."

   These days we hear frequently about so-called autonomy talks
between Egypt and Israel. To you and me thousands of miles away from
the scene, the concept of Regional Autonomy for the Palestinians may
sound pretty good, but to the Palestinians themselves it is no
solution at all. They see it as nothing more than a way to lock them
into their present homeless status for all time; and, my friends, they
are exactly right about that. After all, the Palestinians themselves
are not even party to the so-called autonomy talks which are to decide
their fate. So this was the situation last month on October 6:

  The Middle East, seething with unresolved tensions from great power
map-making of a generation earlier; a disenfranchised minority
struggling to re-establish their national identity; and a single
unorthodox leader seeking a halfway solution based on so-called
Regional Autonomy for the minority.

It sounds like a situation unique to our age; but, my friends, it is
not unique. In important ways it is almost a carbon copy of the
situation that exploded into World War I.

   In 1914 the hot spot of the world was not the Middle East, but the
Balkan Peninsula. The disenfranchised minority of that day were not
the Palestinians but the grouping of peoples known collectively as the
Yugoslavs. Yugoslavia as we know it today did not exist in 1914.
Instead, the map of the region was a patchwork of names like Serbia,
Bosnia, and Herzegovina. Scattered throughout the region were the
interrelated Yugoslav peoples. They had been robbed of their power and
identity a generation earlier, and they wanted it back.

   For several years before the outbreak of World War I, these
tensions led repeatedly to outbreaks of fighting in the Balkans. Into
this dangerous situation stepped Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the
throne of Austria of the Austro-Hungarian empire. He was afraid the
Balkan situation could lead to a breakup of his empire, and so he
proposed a halfway solution to pacify the Yugoslavs while preserving
the status quo. His plan for this disenfranchised minority was called
"Regional Autonomy." It was virtually a prototype for the so-called
autonomy plan we hear about today for the Palestinians. The Yugoslavs
were no more pleased with the so-called autonomy idea in 1914 than the
Palestinians are today in 1981. It was a situation made to order to
set the stage for assassination. That was true in 1914, and it was
true again in 1981, barely a month ago.

   The two assassinations differed in detail, but in overall pattern
they were much the same. Archduke Ferdinand appeared in an open car
wearing the medals and trappings of royalty. Sadat  appeared at a
parade dressed in the medals and trappings of the military. Both were
shot to death without the assassins being interfered with by security
personnel until too late. Both were killed in capital cities near the
Mediterranean--Archduke Ferdinand in the provincial capital of
Sarajevo, Bosnia; Sadat, in Ca iro, Egypt. Both assassinations were
followed immediately by suspicions directed against a neighboring
state. In the case of Sadat, the suspicions were aimed at neighboring
Libya; in the case of Archduke Ferdinand, it was Serbia that drew
accusations; and those accusations, my friends, initiated a process
that led directly to World War I.

   If all these things were not enough, there is one other crucial
similarity today with the situation in 1914. On the eve of World War I
there were two great power blocs opposing one another in Europe. One
was called the Triple Entente, consisting of Britain, France, and
czarist Russia; the other was the Triple Alliance, made up of Germany,
Austria-Hungary, and Italy. These two great power blocs were something
new and dangerous in continental politics. They were permanent
alliances instead of the temporary special purpose alliances of the
past. They were the legacy of balance-of-power politics from the era
of Bismarck and Disraeli. The two blocs were so evenly matched that it
was thought that they would keep the peace, but they both shared a
common weak spot. That weak spot was the Balkan Peninsula. In
themselves, the Balkans were minor players on the world stage; but
there were treaties between the Balkan mini-states and the great
powers. It was through those ties that the great powers were pulled
into what became World War I.

   Today, my friends, we live once again in an era when two great
power blocs have been facing each other for decades. One is centered
on Russia, and the other on the United States, together with their
allies. For example: in Europe itself, NATO stands eyeball to eyeball
with the Warsaw Pact year in, year out. Today it is far worse than in
1914. It is more complicated, and secret alliances are now being
forged. And just as 1914 had its weak spot in the Balkans, the 1981
weak spot is the Middle East together with the Persian Gulf.

   In 1914 the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand came as a
shock to the world. It was the trigger that started a chain of events
that culminated in World War I. Austria-Hungary accused Serbia of
complicity in the assassination and issued a harsh ultimatum. Little
Serbia responded by appealing to Russia for protection, and Russia
agreed to provide it. Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia; Russia
started mobilizing. Austria-Hungary appealed to its ally Germany,
which promptly declared war on Russia. Germany asked Russia's ally
France to stay out of it, but the French were evasive. Germany then
declared war on France, and prepared to march through Belgium to
attack France. Britain gave a warning to Germany not to violate
Belgium's neutrality. The Germans started marching anyway. Britain
declared war on Germany. The situation kept on snowballing like this
until all of Europe was aflame with war. It was a war from which there
could emerge no winners except for unseen powerful forces behind the
scenes, but those forces had succeeded in setting off the unwinnable
war for their own selfish ends--and they started it all with a
surprise assassination!

   When I recorded AUDIO LETTER No. 68 on September 30, I gave a
warning that the entity Sadat was being set up for assassination. The
State Socialists (or American Bolsheviks) here are trying to set off
NUCLEAR WAR ONE by means of techniques similar to those which led to
World War I 67 years ago, and the time had come at last to use Sadat
to help further the plan for war.

   Contrary to appearances, the late President Anwar Sadat did not
initiate negotiations with Israel four years ago on his own
initiative. Instead, he had been turned into an involuntary puppet of
the United States and Israel! I first revealed what had been done to
Sadat four years ago this month in AUDIO LETTER No. 28.

   Up until the spring of 1977, Anwar Sadat had always rejected the
idea of direct negotiations with Israel. In April of that year, Sadat
visited Washington for talks with the then President Carter. When
reporters asked whether he would consider direct negotiations with
Israel, Sadat again dismissed the idea as too drastic. Yet a little
more than six months later Sadat electrified the world with his sudden
peace initiative and visit to Israel. In AUDIO LETTER No. 28 I
reported what had happened to Sadat to so radically change his
thinking. Sadat had been subjected to the psychological programming
techniques which are secretly in use by the United States and other
Intelligence agencies. He was programmed with an irresistible
compulsion to go against all of his past thinking and deal directly
with Israel. The bottom line was what I reported four years ago. To
repeat what I reported then, quote:

  "The Sadat peace initiative to Israel is supposed to be, unknown to
Sadat himself, the first step toward war."

   Last month the Sadat image was put to its final use by the secret
joint military junta of the United States Pentagon and Israel. The
assassination in Cairo ended the Sadat era and, at the same time, it
started the countdown toward collapse of the Egyptian-Israeli Peace
Treaty on the way to war! Within hours of the assassination, Israeli
leaders began expressing doubts whether the peace will survive without
Sadat; and they said that this could cause a re-appraisal of the plan
for Israel to complete its withdrawal from the Sinai on schedule next
spring.

   When Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in June of 1914, it
led very quickly to the outbreak of war. The war was getting underway
by early August, a scant six weeks after the assassination. Today the
same unseen forces and their principals are at work, but the situation
is more complicated. As a result it would be a mistake to expect the
same timetables to apply, but the hollow echoes of 1914 are growing
louder and louder in the Middle East today.

   For the moment, the complex maneuvers of the American
Bolshevik-Zionist junta of the United States and Israel are shifting
to other areas than Egypt. On one hand we are hearing more and more
about Libya. We're gradually being conditioned to the idea that the
Libyan strong man, Khadafy, is a madman who might do just about
anything. This, my friends, is just another ingredient which is being
prepared to be thrown into the American Bolshevik-Zionist war caldron.
When the right moment arrives, Khadafy can be programmed to do
something seemingly insane to help bring on war.

   As long ago as 1974, I reported over radio station WMCA in New York
that Libya is under the United States CIA control. Khadafy and his
henchmen had been brought to the United States and trained by the CIA
to carry out a coup d'etat. Khadafy then went back, carried out the
coup, and installed himself as Libya's new leader. He also installed
the CIA as his indispensable helper. These, my friends, are the facts
behind the shocking recent reports of American involvement in Libya.

   But more important than Libya is Saudi Arabia. When I recorded
AUDIO LETTER No. 68 on September 30, it seemed that the crucial AWACS
deal with Saudi Arabia was in trouble; but I reported that Israel
secretly wanted the AWACS deal to be approved. This is part of the
plan to set up Saudi Arabia to look like a credible threat to Israel.
That will give Israel the excuse it needs to carry out a limited
nuclear strike on the Saudi oil fields.

   My friends, the decisive turning point in the AWACS debate was the
assassination of Anwar Sadat. From that day onward, undecided United
States Senators started coming down in favor of the AWACS deal. Some
key Senators even changed from being against it to being for it, and
said the Sadat assassination had changed their minds. On October 28
the AWACS sale to Saudi Arabia was approved by the United States
Senate. It was the "point of no return" for the Middle East! The peace
overtures of the late Anwar Sadat have served their intended purpose.
These peace overtures have started the world down the road to
thermonuclear war!

Topic #2--Two days ago there was a new flood of bad economic news out
of Washington. Official unemployment figures jumped from 7-1/2% to 8%
in Oc tober, just one month's time. The  deep slumps in housing and
autos are getting deeper, and the Reagan promise of a balanced federal
budget by 1984 has now been officially abandoned. At the same time,
Government figures show that more and more people are going deeper and
deeper into debt. Even as the economy slows down, galloping inflation
is continuing to make it harder to make ends meet.

   Meanwhile, the privately-owned Federal Reserve Corporation is
maintaining the high interest rates that are strangling the economy.
It has been only a few short weeks since America's recession was first
admitted at all by the President. The entity President Reagan startled
reporters by saying the country is in a mild recession. Then other
Government spokesmen softened the blow, calling it a "flat period."
Now these casual-sounding early admissions are being replaced by
reports that grow worse by the day. America's economy is turning sour
too fast for reassuring smiles and empty phrases to hide it any
longer.

   If you want to understand what is really happening to the United
States economy, you must keep your eyes on the basics. There are two
critical sectors of the economy which are the keys to bringing about
prosperity or depression. Those sectors are: Automobiles and Housing.
Both are in deep trouble now; and as they go down, they are pulling
down our whole economy with them.

   The techniques which were used to bring on the Great Depression of
the 1930's are once again being used now. Six years ago in AUDIO
LETTER No. 5 I talked briefly about the wise German professor who
taught me finance, banking, and economics. In the 1920's this man had
been consulted by the Rockefeller interests, who claimed that they
wanted to know how to deflate inflation; but once he had shown them
how it could be done, they misused his information to create the Great
Depression instead!

   This German economist confided many things to me, and one was: how
economies are manipulated. He showed me how the key sectors of Housing
and Automobiles can be used to bring down a whole economy; and three
years ago in AUDIO LETTER No. 41 I gave an early warning that this
process was being set in motion. As I reported then, General Motors
betrayed its advance knowledge of the plan for a new American
depression on November 7, 1978. On that day, GM slashed its dividend
rates in half on GM stock. GM's action three years ago took the Stock
Market by surprise because auto sales had been good; but since that
time interest rates have climbed into the "loan shark" range, and both
automobiles and housing have hit upon hard times. A few days ago it
was announced that auto sales in the United States have slumped to
their lowest level in 23 years.

   The last time things were this bad we were in the severe recession
of 1957 to 1958. But, my friends, you haven't seen anything yet!

   Housing is no better off. Incredible interest rates combined with
unchecked inflation in basic prices have cut housing sales of all
kinds to a trickle. When you hear those monthly statistics about
deepening unemployment, my friends, keep in mind that they are only a
symptom of what is happening.

   General unemployment is following down the same path that is being
taken in housing and autos. In many metropolitan areas, unemployment
in construction trades has already reached 20% and is still
increasing. Likewise, lay-offs are steadily increasing the
unemployment rate in autos. Lost jobs in those two sectors mean other
businesses will slow down too. And so general unemployment can do
nothing but get worse as things stand right now. Millions of American
working people are growing nervous as they see what is happening. Many
are especially worried because they sense a fundamental shift taking
place in the Government's attitude toward Labor.

   Several weeks ago these worries were expressed in the so-called
"Solidarity Day Rally" of a quarter million people right here in
Washington. This time the Rally was peaceful; but I must report that
forces are now at work that are threatening to erupt in violent riots,
both here in Washington and in other major cities soon. One catalyst
for these riots is likely to be the abrupt cancellation of benefits
for the needy. The problem is not so much what is being done as the
way it is being done. Instead of phasing out these programs in a way
that would give a period of adjustment, they are just being lopped
off. Many people are being made to feel that they are being cast onto
the trash heap. Resentment and desperation are building. At the same
time, shortages are coming in America. These shortages will come to
include food, sooner than most of us imagine.

   One of the favorite political weapons of the Bolsheviks has always
been hunger, because it is so powerful. They used it long ago in
Russia. They are using it today in Poland, and they will use it
tomorrow right here in the United States! Widespread hunger can be
brought about in America even if there is no lack of agricultural
production.

   In that respect, the situation has changed dramatically during the
past year because, my friends, the Soviet Union has called off its
program of weather modification to reduce our crops. If you will
recall, the Bolshevik-dominated former Carter Administration declared
a grain embargo against Russia in January of 1980. The following month
I reported in AUDIO LETTER No. 54 that the Kremlin was retaliating by
means of massive modification of America's weather. For the next four
months I was not able to give monthly updates on the situation because
I was recovering from a near-fatal heart attack; but by the time I
resumed my AUDIO LETTER series in June 1980, the weather had become
big news here in America. Vast growing areas of the United States were
in the grip of a scorching drought that was both unexpected and very
severe. The Russians made sure that they got their point across to our
peanut farmer president then in office. For the first time on record
the Deep South peanut crop failed in 1980. It was destroyed by the
weather.

   The United States grain embargo against Russia had been a Bolshevik
attempt to use the-hunger weapon on an international scale, but it
backfired. The Russians tightened their belts a notch but suffered
little. Instead, it was the United States that was on the brink of an
era of hunger due to crop failure, and it would have taken place in
ways that could have caused real trouble for our own Unseen Rulers.
They want to impose hunger on you and me but only on their own
timetable as a way to control us. And so six months ago the grain
embargo against Russia was ended. As a result, America's weather
returned to normal during the summer of 1981 just passed. The
drought-stricken areas of a year ago have in many cases received
drenching rains to restore their productivity. As I said earlier, the
immediate threat of hunger in America is no longer due to crop failure
caused by Russian weather modification. Instead, when hunger strikes,
it may well be brought about by a sudden disruption of our food
distribution system.

   Today we live in an age of agribusiness with production of most of
our food stuffs concentrated in a few prime areas. The greatest
concentration of all is in California, which produces from 40% to 50%
of many of our fruits and vegetables. Other agricultural states
specialize in other parts of our food supply--grains, meats, etc. What
ties the whole country together so that we all have food to eat is
transportation. There is a motto that says "America's needs move by
truck." Nowhere is that more true than it is for our food supply.
Supermarkets nation-wide carry only about a 3-day supply of food on
their shelves. They have to be re-stocked continuously by a steady
stream of trucks.

   Trucks, my friends, depend upon petroleum supplies in order to keep
moving. Once the Saudi oil fields are capped off by the Israeli
nuclear strike, there will be a sudden cutoff of much of our oil. If
the plan is carried out successfully, it will mean gas rationing and
restricted movement for us all. It will al so mean serious disruptions
in food distribution.

   A while ago I mentioned the recent Washington rally under the name
"Solidarity Day." In a way, that was an ironic name to choose. It
makes one think of the so-called Solidarity Labor Union in Poland. In
Poland the Solidarity Union is a tool of the American Bolsheviks who
are trying to destroy the economy for purposes of revolution and war.
Here in America, the American Bolsheviks are also trying to destroy
the economy--and for similar reasons. But here, they are trying to do
it through the Government itself. As America's economy continues to
deteriorate, the battle continues in the secret power struggle to
control the United States Government.

   The two factions in this power struggle are the State Bolsheviks
and the Corporate Fascists, as I detailed in AUDIO LETTER No. 67.
Lately this struggle is surfacing in public skirmishes. The latest
example is the flap over the White House "guerilla campaign" against
Secretary of State Alexander Haig. Meanwhile the destruction of our
economy is continuing. Our country is being Polandized--that is,
America is being weakened economically to set the stage for war, just
as is being done to Poland.

   America's economic destruction is being orchestrated by the money
managers of the Federal Reserve Corporation and Treasury Department.
But to maintain the pretense of trying to help our economy, the plan
for a bogus new gold standard for our currency or Treasury Bonds is
still moving ahead quietly. I can report that the Federal Gold
Commission has now had its life quietly extended by Congress until
March 31, 1982. The Gold Standard ploy is intended to look good, but
it is a sham. How can an alleged Gold Standard mean anything if the
alleged gold reserves do not exist? After all, when President Nixon
closed the gold window in 1971, it was because America's gold reserves
had been secretly depleted! Nixon's Treasury Secretary at the time was
John Connally, and he has now gone public with strong opposition to
the Gold Standard idea--and his reason is simple. Last month the New
York Times for October 19 quoted Connally as saying:

      "We don't have the gold."

   Wherever you look, there are nothing but questions about the true
status of America's gold supplies. For example: three years ago the
major media for once created a sensation about the New York Assay
Office. They reported, correctly, that some 5,000 ounces of gold were
missing--gone without a trace! Well, my friends, the major media ought
to go back and check again with their sources. For the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1981, there is still more gold missing at the New
York Assay Office! Supposedly there was a tightening of security and
procedures there after the scandal three years ago--at least that's
what the Treasury Department told the public. But for this past year
alone, another 3,163 ounces of gold have vanished.

   Yes, my friends, America is being Polandized. Just as Poland is the
victim of deliberate economic turmoil, so are we. The objective in
Poland is to bring on social upheaval, bloodshed, and the prelude to
war. And that is also the objective right here in the United States.
When unemployment and hunger riots materialize, they will trigger the
secret military "OPERATION GARDEN PLOT" which I first reported in the
summer of 1975. It is all part of the plan for a National Emergency to
come on the way to NUCLEAR WAR ONE.

Topic #3--Early last month on October 2, the entity President Reagan
announced his long-awaited decision on the MX Missile Program. For the
past several years we've been hearing about the MX and all kinds of
possible mobile basing for it. We've been told that the MX will have
to be mobile in order to survive a Russian nuclear attack.

   Having heard this for years, a lot of people were shocked when they
heard the Reagan decision on the MX. He declared that the famous MX
race track system out West will not be built after all. Instead, they
will simply be used to replace aging Titan missiles when deployment
begins in 1986. At least that is the announced plan for the first 36
MX missiles. The President said, in effect, that he doesn't yet know
what to do with the rest of the MXs that will be built. That is so
even though the Reagan Administration plans to build only a hundred of
them--half as many as previously planned.

   Many people who closely follow defense matters were stunned by the
announcement. "Whatever happened to the mobile missile idea", they
wondered. My friends, the answer is still what I revealed in AUDIO
LETTER No. 55 in June 1980. America's real mobile missile is not the
MX at all but a smaller, completely secret missile. It's called the
"Minuteman TX", and it is being deployed now on America's railroads!
Each TX missile is transported in a special car with a barn-like
peaked roof.

   A number of my listeners have seen and photographed Minuteman TX
missile cars since I described them in my June 1980 report. About six
months ago I released a special bulletin which presents two of these
photographs. In AUDIO LETTER No. 55 I explained that the publicity
surrounding the so-called MX program was only a cover for the secret
TX mobile missile program. Recently I reported that the TX missile
deployment is scheduled to be completed by next spring, around six
months from now. Now that the program is nearing completion, the MX
mobile missile cover story has just about run its course. That's why
the Reagan Administration is now dropping its pretenses that the MX
will be mobile.

   Controversy will continue to swirl around the MX program, but the
idea of a mobile missile is now changing in official public
statements. Now that the Minuteman TX system is becoming an
accomplished fact, we are beginning to hear trial balloons to get us
used to the idea. For example, Senator John Glenn appeared on the CBS
television program "Face the Nation" last month on October 18. Senator
Glenn said that the Department of Defense ought to deploy a smaller
mobile missile than the MX. He proposed putting them in trailers on
the nation's roads, traveling all around the country. The system he
described was almost identical to the secret TX, the traveling
Minuteman, which I made public 17 months ago. There was only one
important difference in what Senator Glenn described. He carefully
avoided talking about railroads but instead talked about truck
trailers. If he had mentioned railroads, he would have "let the cat
out of the bag" because railroads are how the secret TX missiles are
actually deployed.

   The deep secrecy surrounding the Minuteman TX program springs from
the fact that it is not a defensive weapon. America's secret military
planners plan to use it in a nuclear first strike against Russia. On
top of that, the TX missiles in our midst are placing all of us on the
front lines for a nuclear attack. Today we are all in the trenches!

   Up to now the major media have maintained a news blackout on my
charges to this effect, but one magazine has now had the courage to
publish my charges together with TX missile car photographs. The
magazine is called COMBAT READY. My charges are published in an
article titled: "IS THE MX A SHOOT-FIRST WEAPON?" It is in the January
1982 issue which just went on sale nation-wide.

   I first reported that America was secretly shifting to a
first-strike nuclear policy against Russia in the summer of 1978. At
the time, many people found that idea unbelievable; but now, as war
itself draws closer, the first-strike posture of the United States is
becoming more and more obvious.

   Soon after the Reagan MX decision was announced last month, its
first-strike implications were spelled out in the New York Times by
Herbert Scoville, Jr. Scoville, a former Deputy Director of the CIA,
wrote an article which begins with the words, quote:

  "President Reagan's decision on the MX missile signals that the
United States is now firmly and publicly embarked on a first-strike
strategic nuclear policy. This is a prescription for a nuclear
disaster--a disaster unparalleled in the history of man kind."

Scoville points out that the MX as advertised makes sense only as a
first-strike weapon. For one thing, the MX is alleged to be an
anti-ICBM weapon,  but the only way the MX could destroy Russian ICBMs
sitting on the ground would be if the Russians had not fired them yet.
In other words, we would have to shoot first. Scoville points out that
the "shoot first" idea becomes even more necessary in light of the
decision to put them in old Titan silos. The Defense Department itself
says that Russia's largest missiles, quote: "are capable of destroying
any known fixed target with high probability." In other words, the
Titan silos cannot be hardened enough to protect them from Russian
missiles, so the only way the MX could be used would be to shoot
first.

   If all Americans were aware of authoritative statements of alarm
like this one, perhaps disaster could be averted; but most people
these days never hear such warnings. If we are lucky and alert, we may
see it once in a newspaper; but it is soon washed away by the never
ending flood of lies from Washington. Most of us remain oblivious to
the danger, and so we raise not a word in protest as our leaders sell
us down the river to disaster!

   Even so, the secret first-strike preparations of the United States
are not entirely without opposition. The plan is known within the
walls of the Kremlin, and Russia's leaders are at work on several
fronts. For one thing, they are continuing the campaign of attrition
against America's war-making capacity which they started several years
ago. One day a railroad train derails and several chemical tank cars,
bound for a defense plant, explode. Another day an unexplained
explosion wipes a small weapons laboratory off the face of the earth.
Next, a rash of military plane crashes takes place. The pattern keeps
changing constantly so that it cannot be identified, but it is there
and it has its effect!

   What the Kremlin hopes for most in its campaign of attrition is
that America's war plans will somehow be deterred altogether. That is
their hope, but it is not what they actually expect. Of all people on
earth, Russia's present-day leaders know the Bolshevik mind. So long
as the Bolsheviks here continue to determine American military policy,
the Russians are convinced that war is inevitable; and so with their
ongoing campaign of attrition, they are trying to limit the damage
that can be done to Russia.

   From time to time the Russians carry out something spectacular in
their double campaign of deterrence and attrition. As I say these
words, an incident has just ended that had deterrence as its main
purpose. I'm referring to the celebrated case of the Soviet submarine
which ran aground in supersensitive restricted Swedish waters.

   Three weeks ago Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger became the
first American Defense Secretary ever to visit Sweden. He spent four
days there. The Bolsheviks here want to entangle Sweden and all of the
North countries in their war plans. The Russians are equally
determined to prevent that, so it was decided that Sweden should be
encouraged to think twice before involving themselves militarily with
the United States.

   Two submarines were dispatched to the Swedish coast. Both were
instructed to use their sonar-defeating equipment to penetrate the
Swedish coastal defense zone. Next, one was to play "cat and mouse"
with Swedish anti-submarine forces; the other one was to let itself be
discovered deliberately, deep inside one of Sweden's most sensitive
naval zones. This is how the case of Soviet Submarine 137 came about.

   It has been portrayed as an embarrassment for Russia, but it was
really the opposite. The Russian Sub Commander maneuvered his boat so
deeply into tricky, heavily defended waters as to make it painfully
obvious that it was no accident. Then, in a demonstration of the wry
Russian sense of humor, he carefully nudged his boat onto some rocks
and just waited to be discovered. After a while, the "sub" was
discovered--not by the Swedish Navy but by a fishing boat! At the
purely professional military level, it would be hard to imagine
anything more embarrassing for the Swedish Navy, or more sobering.
Just to make sure though, the other Russian "sub" started through its
paces as soon as Sub 137 had been found on the rocks. The second
"sub", deep within Swedish territorial waters, de-activated its
sonar-defeating equipment and then prowled around as noisily as
possible until a Swedish Anti-submarine Warfare Task Group arrived.
The Swedes were all set to start dropping depth charges on the
seemingly trapped "sub." Then the sonar-defeating equipment was turned
on again and the "sub" simply vanished.

   Taken all together, the total experience was a downright scary one
for the Swedish Navy. The Russians allowed the Swedes to save face in
the public eye; but it was the Swedes, not the Russians, who heaved a
sigh of relief when Soviet Submarine 137 returned to international
waters two days ago. The Russians are hoping the Swedes will not
involve themselves in America's suicidal first-strike posture; but, my
friends, they will!

                       LAST MINUTE SUMMARY

   Now it's time for my LAST MINUTE SUMMARY. As I say these words, an
American space shuttle is once again being prepared for launch. We're
told that it is the shuttle "Columbia", but that shuttle was destroyed
by Russia last April. Instead, it is the training shuttle
"Enterprise", relabeled Columbia, that now sits on the pad at Cape
Canaveral.

   According to my latest information, NASA still plans to carry out
an aborted mission of some type. It may be an aborted take-off as I
first reported last June, or it may be an abbreviated orbital mission;
but in any event, the lives of the astronauts are in very grave
danger!

   Whatever NASA does, it will be a desperate gamble. They are trying
to keep up public appearances so that their military space shuttle
plans will not be halted; but Russian Cosmospheres are once again on
patrol along the Cape Canaveral launch corridor. This shuttle is
carrying no military payload, so perhaps they may not
interfere--PERHAPS. No matter what happens when the space shuttle
takes off, one thing is certain: the Government will not tell you and
me the truth about it. The space shuttle could be a tool for peace,
but our Leaders are trying to use it instead to prepare for
war--nuclear war!

   Like the Sadat assassination, the MX missile decision, and
America's worsening economy, the Space Shuttle Program is launching us
into disaster!

   What we lack most of all these days is the truth. Our Rulers have
built their power on lies. So long as we accept those lies, we remain
within their power to use and destroy us. They walk in darkness, and
they try to keep us in the dark. The only way to break free, the ONLY
WAY, is to SEEK AND CHERISH THE "TRUTH." The light of the Truth takes
away the power of darkness and lies. The Truth is the Sword of our
Lord Jesus Christ, and with it mankind can yet be free and live in
peace. The choice, my friends, is up to you and me.

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and
may God bless each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])